| Financier | Commitments |
|---|---|
| IDA Credit | 22.32 |
| IDA Grant | 47.68 |
Second AF for Strengthening Safety Nets Systems Project MASAF IV
Development Objective
The Project Development Objective is to improve resilience among poor households and to strengthen Malawiâ??s social safety net delivery systems and coordination across programs.
Key Details
Project Details
P160519
Closed
Ivan Drabek
N/A
September 22, 2016
(as of board presentation)
November 8, 2016
N/A
US$ 70.00 million
N/A
2017
US$ 70.00 million
B
January 17, 2024
June 30, 2021
Yes
BANK APPROVED
Finances
Financing Plan (US$ Millions)
Total Project Financing (US$ Millions)
| Product Line | IBRD/IDA |
|---|---|
| IBRD Commitment | N/A |
| IDA Commitment | 70.00 |
| IBRD + IDA Commitment | 70.00 |
| Lending Instrument | |
|---|---|
| Grant Amount | N/A |
| Total Project Cost** | 70.00 |
Summary Status of World Bank Financing (US$ Millions) as of March 31, 2025
No data available.
Detailed Financial Activity as of March 31, 2025
No data available.
Results Framework
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
Beneficiaries of Safety Nets Programs - (Unconditional) Social Cash Transfers (number) (Number, Core Breakdown) Value 0 21,568 21,000 Date October 18, 2013 March 15, 2016 June 30, 2018 Comment Number of direct beneficiaries of PWP - emergency response Value 0.00 0.00 902000.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Number of direct beneficiaries of Social Cash Transfers (SCT) Value 0.00 21000.00 123711.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Number of direct beneficiaries of PWP - regular beneficiaires Value 0 985,635 (53% female) 985,635 (of which 50% female) Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Indicator was incorrectly entered in the Bankâs system as a breakdown indicator Percentage of households with asset value above critical threshold Value 33% livelihood and skills development, 25% PWP, 4. 33% livelihood and skills development, 25% PWP, 4. no set target Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Assessment is under way, results are due by end-2016 Establishment of an integrated and functional national safety net delivery systems Value 0 2 35 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment 2 districts with integrated and functional safety net delivery system 35 districts with integrated and functional safety net delivery system
INTERMEDIATE RESULTS INDICATORS
| INDICATOR | BASELINE | CURRENT | TARGET |
|---|
Number of COMSIP and other livelihood groups formed and strengthened Value 4457.00 5241.00 6697.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Number of groups formed under COMSIP only so far Number of people trained on skill development activities Value 0.00 2201.00 0.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment No set target, as it will depend on group demands for skills development activities, i.e. product value addition. Number of Local Authorities with operational MIS Value 0 2 35 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Number of Local Authorities with operational M&E system Value 0 2 35 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Number of extension workers trained and supported with equipment Value 0.00 1116.00 1350.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Percentage of households having at least three meals per day Value 21.20 0.00 70.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Assessment is under way, results are due by end-2016 Percentage of participants paid within the agreed time frame (two weeks for PWP and within a month for SCT) Value 50 for STC, 54 for PWP 100 for STC, assessment under way for PWP 100 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Percentage of beneficiaries receiving full entitlement (PWP, SCT) Value 0 100 100 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Percentage of beneficiaries staying in the program for a minimum of three years (PWP, SCT) Value 0.00 0.00 80.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Percentage of subprojects selected and implemented following participatory community-based planning approaches Value 0.00 100.00 100.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Percentage of subprojects or investment for which arrangement for community engagement and or operation and maintenance are established Value 0.00 30.00 70.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Percentage of households reporting that asset depletion is prevented as a result of transfers (SCT, PWP) Value 0.00 0.00 40.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Assessment is under way, results are due by end-2016 Number of Local Authorities with community safety net plans developed in a participatory approach Value 0.00 28.00 35.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Number and type of productive community assets completed (re-forestation, road construction and maintenance, irrigation) Value 0 4,069 hectares re-afforested, 5,050 roads construc no set targets Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment These are demand-driven interventions based on community priorities Percentage of subprojects screened for ESMF Value 0.00 80.00 100.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Percentage of subprojects for which safeguard mitigation plans are developed and are being implemented Value 0.00 80.00 100.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Number of Local Authorities implementing harmonized targeting instruments to select beneficiaries Value 0.00 2.00 35.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment End target based on the assumption that all Local Authorities will have targeting systems for PW. Number of groups/cooperatives accessing grants for investments Value 0.00 95.00 400.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Percentage of households that report improved access to social services Value 0 No set target Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Assessment is under way, results are due by end-2016 These are demand-driven interventions based on community priorities. Percentage increase in household productive assets by type Value 0.00 0.00 25.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Assessment is under way, results are due by end-2016 Number of Local Authorities with operational harmonized targeting mechanism Value 0.00 2.00 35.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Percentage of beneficiaries who are aware of project information and project supported investments Value 0.00 0.00 100.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Assessment under way, result will be known by end-2016 Percentage of grievances registered related to delivery of project benefits that are actually addressed Value 0.00 0.00 100.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Assessment under way, result will be known by end-2016 % of people reporting improvement in the natural resource and environment and its benefit to communities as a result of PW activities (Percentage, Custom) Value 0.00 0.00 60.00 Date October 18, 2013 March 15, 2016 June 30, 2018 Comment Unit of measure for this indicator was incorrectly entered in the Bankâs system as âAmount USDâ Percentage of households that report improved access to and use of small scale irrigation Value 5 no set target Date September 30, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Based on MASAF III achievements Assessment is under way, results are due by end-2016 These are demand-driven interventions based on community priorities Percentage of people engaging in diversified income-generation activities (off-farm and on-farm) Value 63.00 0.00 80.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment 63% is for old groups, 0 for new groups Assessment is under way, results will be known by end-2016 80% for old groups, 50% for new groups Percentage increase in household level savings Value 84 (old groups) 0 (new groups) 100.00 (old groups) 70 (new groups) Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Baseline for old groups based on COMSIP groups only for the period 2009-2013 Assessment is under way, results are due by end-2016 % of beneficiaries that feel project investments/ PWP investments reflected their needs (Percentage, Core) Value 0.00 0.00 80.00 Date October 18, 2013 March 15, 2016 June 30, 2018 Comment Indicator was incorrectly entered in the Bankâs system as a breakdown indicator Percentage of beneficiaries who feel project investments/PWP reflected their needs Value 74.10 0.00 80.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment Based on MASAF III Beneficiary Assessment Percentage of people reporting improvement in the natural resource and environment and its benefit to communities as a result of public works activities Value 0.00 0.00 60.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2015 December 31, 2019 Comment Number of people trained on livelihood development activities Value 0.00 22000.00 0.00 Date September 1, 2014 September 28, 2016 December 31, 2019 Comment No set target, it will be based on the number of groups formed and related training needs